Loss Mitigation & Repurchase Defense

National Leaders in High-Stakes Mortgage Disputes.

At BRODY | GAPP LLP, we have collectively defended more mortgage lenders in repurchase and indemnification disputes than perhaps any other law firm in the country. Our attorneys have been at the forefront of this space since the fallout of the financial crisis—including representation in over 70 Lehman Brothers indemnification lawsuits in the Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court, more than 10 lawsuits filed by CitiMortgage, and numerous investor and agency claims nationwide.

We bring this depth of experience to every engagement—knowing that while success can never be guaranteed, seasoned counsel makes a measurable difference when navigating the complexities of repurchase liability, investor pushback, and litigation strategy.

We take a holistic, litigation-ready approach—assessing defenses, uncovering third-party liability, and asserting counterclaims where appropriate. Whether you’re dealing with GSE indemnification demands, EPD disputes, title breakdowns, or fraud-related losses, we move quickly and strategically to minimize exposure and recover losses where possible.

Our Services Include:

  • Repurchase, Make-Whole & Indemnification Defense – Representing lenders in high-value disputes with GSEs, investors, aggregators, and warehouse lenders.
  • Title, Fraud & Early Payment Default Claims – Defending and prosecuting disputes tied to wire fraud, EPDs, and title-related defects.
  • Subservicer Negligence & CPL-Linked Claims – Addressing servicing breakdowns, escrow errors, and closing protection letter exposures.
  • Third-Party Litigation & Cross-Claims – Pursuing recovery from appraisers, title companies, former employees, and other liable parties.

With so much on the line, you need legal counsel that’s been here before—and won’t need a learning curve. BRODY | GAPP LLP brings unmatched experience and clarity to every repurchase defense.

Prior results described on this website do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Each case turns on its own facts and applicable law.